@Lethologica
I'm not interested interested in an argument about your capabilities, but if you wanted to prove them to me, you could have clicked on the provided link and answered every of your posed questions except the following:
-Do you know who your competitors are?
Vote4US, Countable, ICounter, Facebook, Twitter, to name a few.
-Do you know why your app is better than your competitors' products?
All current competitors fall into at least one of these three categories:
1) Significantly partisan and biased, consisting of 3rd-party media sources,
2)Cluttered with the baggage of social media;
3) Lacking in the depth, scope, and connectivity of features our app provides
-Have you acquired any notable partners, advisors, sponsors, or early adopters
Andrew Figgins
(http://m.builtinchicago.org/member/andrew-figgins)
-How do you plan to vet the information on your platform?
Politicians will be the only ones who can post in large sections of the app, (news/updates, praise/criticism, personal info, views & decisions). To ensure a non-partasin environment, nothing will be censored except for blatent, contextually unnecessary obscenities. However, politicians will have to put their name on everything they post. Constituent comments will have designated spots for input, and will remain similarly uncensored. Feel free to ask me any further questions on this topic and/or the one below after looking at the screenshots; I would be happy to develop their explanations to the level you deem adequate.
-How do you plan to vet the people on your platform?
Most information will be able to be viewed without an account, but dynamic features requiring personal interaction will be limited to users who have created an account containing basic personal info.