A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Start a new discussion in the public forum
Post a new thread
If your post relates to a particular game please include the URL or ID#
of the game.
If you are posting a feature request please check that it isn't mentioned in the todo list.
If you are posting a question please check the FAQ before posting.
If your message is long you may need to write a summary message, and add the full message as a reply.
10 Legends, 1 Future: If We Had To Repopulate The Human Race...
...and you could choose ANY 10 human beings to ever live to redo it...to pass on their intellect and genes and being--and yes, I know Einstein+Curie +/= Super Science Baby, just go with this "re-imagining" of how it works, it's all in fun--who would you choose? And the ration of XX to XY MUST be 50/50 or 60/40...no 9 men-one-queen relationships! ;) So...who would you pick to create Humanity 2.0?
I'm in need of one, and finally have enough spare time to play on this site again. So time for a comeback game. Classic, WTA. Medium pot (for me, so between 50-150). Phase length can be decided but preferably between 1-2 days. Anyone up for it?
Hi Somewhat new to this site. I've helped put as a replacement elsewhere and would not be against doing so here but I get turned off with what seems to me to an inappropiately high bet for terrible positions. I assume there are difficulties making this better. Thoughts?
Can someone retreat to the spot from which you attacked them? Example: Austrian A Vie attacks Italian A Tri (A Vie supported by A Bud). A Tri forced to retreat. Can they retreat into the now vacant Vie SC?
Turns out, world smartest people are Asians. Why would that be?
In one the numerous "political debate" threads haunting this forum, Fasces posted a list of countries by average IQ. The entire top 7 is Asian, and on 10 there is Mongolia (which is weird, because you never hear anything about Mongolia). Why do they score so well?
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=74801 The game is for trolls and semi-trolls. It is anon and global chat so will be focused on humorously trolling on one another anonymously. Then in the end we find out who's whom.
Putin is seeing vaginas in onions? Dude...you need to get laid...I feel sorry for you. I know it is *extremely* painful to see you communist ideal recognize the wonderful thing that is called capitalism, but...
Wait... I'm confused. How is it bourgeois? Burger King is hyper affordable compared to Wendy's. On par with McD and Arby's and their 2 for $3 deals are better than McD and comparable to Arby's 2 for and 3 for deals. 5 guys is bourgeois, yes. Wendy's is where fast food is concerned, but not Burger King.
Did you bother to watch the ad? It's clear vaginal imagery. Are you pretending like commercials do not insert sexual imagery in random objects?
I did not have consumer cost in mind when I spoke of it being bourgeois. Burger King is an infamous multi-national corporation. Its existence in foreign countries speaks to capital's penetration of those countries. All fast food companies treat their farm laborers like slaves. I cannot think of a single major fast food chain which hasn't been subject to a boycott based on labor practices.
Maybe we should pass some kind of law that prohibits farmers from growing vagina-shaped onions. That would probably help. Then we could set up some kind of governmental agency to regulate everything. Those two things would just about do the trick I think. What should we call the agency I wonder?
Lol, my bad. Ok let me get back to something you said:
"I'm not complaining about the onion or vaginal imagery, generally. That part just stood out for being more unusual than the average ad."
So, let me get this straight. It's not onions you object to and it's not vaginas. You also see nothing unusual in a guy making a mask out of a hamburger patty or in the juxtoposition of an innocent child eating a burger while sexualized women get BK tattoos nearby. No, it's the combination of onions & vaginas that really made you post his thread.
I just want to make sure I understand. And really, I appreciate the fascinating glimpse into your mind. In some other threads I didn't fully understand where you were coming from. Now I think things are a little more clear.