@_Jeff Kuta.. A wise chappy once observed that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" & when I reminisce upon the first time I gazed upon The Fire breathing MemSahib, Her Indoors lying around on a sofa eating cakes, I kick myself for not having consulted a good optician immediately prior to that ominous event. However, mathematically speaking I am a simple chap, or simpleton, so for me, the number i (being the square root of minus one) is beautiful in it's own right, and it doesn't need Euler to give it identity, lustre or beauty. I adore the number i for i's own, singular merits. In this brave new world of gender and identity tolerance, may I diplomatically suggest that you are being somewhat Paternalistic and repressive with georgious little i, by implying that it is only as a dependent of this Euler blighter that i can have identity and beauty. I might draw a parallel between i and those bisexuality types whom we now embrace, if at arms length at times, in that on a two dimensional plane with x & y axis there are both a positive and negative solution to any square root that can be plotted on said plane if x is the square root of y. Similarly we can say that the square root of minus 16 is plus, and minus 4i ...So I say that in this brave new world of freedom of identity expression, the number i has an inalienable right to self determination and self expression. And let's have an end to this outdated mathematical cultural imperialism and repression