You have gone too far. Silence yourself for twenty-four hours

if you're wondering why Trump won, senseless accusations with zero evidence that distract from actual talking points:

probably in the top 3

Yan, is number 1 that Obama wiretapped Trump's phones because I'm still waiting for evidence on that one.

@Hauta

number 1 is:

"they do it all the time, so doesn't that justify me?"

Yan, sorry but I didn't catch that one. please elaborate.

Will Amazon arrange delivery to Capt Brad & fiedler for "gift purchases" ? Does this perfume have an addictive, hypnotic & hallucinogenic effect on weak minded blighters similar to Turniphead TrumpGod's speeches & tweets ?

Come on Capt Brad ...
...Please, please mute me soon.

Yep, the swine are beating up on Ivanka now. There are no depths to which they won't stoop.

I can go lower. Do you know why Barron von Trump doesn't want to go to school in DC?

@Hauta

I say:

"you are making completely unverified claims"

you say:

"yeah but they did too about Obama"


you're either a hypocrite or intellectually lazy

Yan, huh? I admit the claim about the perfume-bribery is pretty baseless. I'd love to see Amazon's data of course. That should put it to bed conclusively. But when did I say "yeah but they did too about Obama" -- about the wiretapping accusation. That was baseless too -- but Trump won't admit it.

So where is the hypocrisy? fwiw, I'm always intellectually lazy.

you didn't say the perfume-bribery thing was baseless, and if what you were attempting was satire...

try again

It's not entirely baseless. She used to sell through a middleman, Nordstrums. Now that she has almost cut out the middleman by using Amazon, she sees more money per unit sold. If she worked out a volume discount with Amazon, even more money still. Now all that is left is a desire for foreign governments to want to pay Trump and for Trump, who hasn't put his assets into a blind trust, to want more money. So, what I propose is pretty baseless, but not entirely. I sure do wish Trump had put his assets into a blind trust. That'd really shut me up...

^ what a fool

both are supremely baseless, and can only be given any credibility with solidified evidence.

your doing so here is just as vile as them accusing Obama of wiretaps. if there is any reason why i should NOT be drawing an equivalency between your actions and theirs, please do elaborate

Don't forget about "Cologne for Jared" haha

@Yan, the difference is that I laid out my whole case; Trump did not. My case has circumstantial evidence where the theory can be disproven by evidence supplied by Amazon, which unfortunately is out of my control. On the other hand, Trump has no evidence, circumstantial or not, to support his case. Worse yet, he has the power to order Sessions to get the answer right now.

"I can go lower. Do you know why Barron von Trump doesn't want to go to school in DC?"

- because it's full of lil marxist creeps?

Why would anyone want to go school in DC?

I think the rich fancy types go to Sidwell Friends, a private school. Maybe there's another, even more exclusive school that I don't know about.

@Hauta

so you're making accusations that can only be disproven by things out of your control?

fine, you are above Trump: you are tabloid nonsense

have fun

"I can go lower. Do you know why Barron von Trump doesn't want to go to school in DC?"


I'm curious where you were going with this Hauta ?

@fielder

it's about time to ignore him

I know, but I just want to show him the mirror on his way out....

Chona

I love the smell of well-done steak with ketchup in the morning.

"your doing so here is just as vile as them accusing Obama of wiretaps"

One is the president of the United States and the other is some guy on the internet, so no.