Hmm, so on the point of really digging into policy, I think Trump's 6 Steps in his Contract with the American Voter deserve a decent look.
1) Congressional Term Limits
It's a lofty fight, but a noble (and popular) goal. He will be fighting the career senators and representatives to get this amendment. Though he would find some allies in Congress, like Oklahoma's Bridenstine who is about to enter his 3rd and final term, where he promised to limit his number of times running for this office to 3 back when he first ran in 2012 (and which I know he'll hold having actually met him). Others in Congress who've made this same campaign promise would back this proposal. Meanwhile Clinton has not spoken up on this issue.
2) Federal Hiring Freeze (with military, public safety, and public health exemptions)
Truly an interesting case. And one of the easiest to fulfill. This one is just a flick of a pen. And its effects? Well, that digs into murkier water. The trend is already downward for the portion of the workforce who work in the federal government. People are choosing to work for more local governments, and the federal government has done quite a bit of contracting instead of hiring their own workers over the past some odd years. I assume this action would just speed up those trends a bit.
3) 2 Regulations for 1
Here's where I tilt my head and raise an eyebrow. This step was incredibly vague, especially following the other 2 steps. It's a deterrence against new regulations, but I have the following questions:
How to impose/enforce this?
Couldn't certain people try to create a new regulation that does the work of 2 or 3 or 4 other regulations as well as impose new language?
What regulations would take priority in this sort of case?
4) 5 Year Ban on WH Officials Becoming Lobbyists
5) Lifetime Ban on WH Officials Lobbying for Foreign Governments
6) Ban on Foreign Lobbyists Raising Money for American Elections
I put these last 3 together because they go together quite well, though I had assumed the sixth was already in place. I'm quite sure FECA prohibits foreign donations to American electoral campaigns, so that one in particular could use a little clarification. 4 and 5 are very to the point. I'm not quite sure what sort of impact that would have, but it could warrant discussion, at least.