Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Claesar
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1336
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:34 am
Karma: 842

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#261 Post by Claesar » Thu Oct 10, 2019 5:42 am

You got me there. I'm indeed not willing to relinquish my position as player. Touché.
1

gimix
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:56 am
Karma: 37

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#262 Post by gimix » Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:24 am

If we end the game here, counting this last phase, then Claesar is the winner with 44 pts owing to Bob being stuck in that not-so-popular coalition :shock:
2

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 6515
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 1413
Contact:

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#263 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:00 am

The only person who can declare the outcome, be that victory for Claesar or some other outcome, is a recognised GM.

I have offered to provide this service but Claesar rudely blocked my genuine offer of assistance because that's just the kind of bitter, withered husk he is.
2

BobMcBob
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Karma: 200

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#264 Post by BobMcBob » Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:23 am

Jamiet99uk wrote:
Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:00 am
I have offered to provide this service but Claesar rudely blocked my genuine offer of assistance because that's just the kind of bitter, withered husk he is.
Of course, this wasn't at all an offer you knew he wouldn't accept given that he plays win and would not be willing to give up a winning position as being GM would necessarilly imply.

Also, I second Cleasar as GM.
1

damo666
Posts: 3652
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 257

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#265 Post by damo666 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:11 am

I veto all strays
1

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 6515
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 1413
Contact:

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#266 Post by Jamiet99uk » Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:23 pm

Can anyone contact Temasek?
1

BobMcBob
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Karma: 200

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#267 Post by BobMcBob » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:24 am

I mean, I can PM him. But I presume someone's already done that. Right?
2

Jamiet99uk
Posts: 6515
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 1413
Contact:

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#268 Post by Jamiet99uk » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:45 am

Which country does he live in?

One of us should go there and look for him in person.

I nominate Claesar.
1

Claesar
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1336
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:34 am
Karma: 842

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#269 Post by Claesar » Fri Oct 11, 2019 10:54 am

The Player Map says Singapore. We'll all need to chip in for the flight..
1

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 2725
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: America
Karma: 1001

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#270 Post by Squigs44 » Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:46 pm

Claesar wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 10:54 am
The Player Map says Singapore. We'll all need to chip in for the flight..
If you all pay for my plane ticket I'd take one for the team and spend some time in Singapore finding Temasek as well as some other fun things.
2

Temasek22
Posts: 292
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2019 8:00 am
Location: Not Singapore
Karma: 106

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#271 Post by Temasek22 » Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:29 am

Sorry team, real life got really busy, and for some time my WiFi couldn’t load the pHp forum site.

I’m indecisive here. I suppose we can:

A) Cancel the game :(
B) Declare whoever with the most points the winner (including the last phase or not)

Sorry again guys.
3

Claesar
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1336
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:34 am
Karma: 842

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#272 Post by Claesar » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:18 am

Temasek22 wrote:
Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:29 am
...
B) Declare whoever with the most points the winner (including the last phase

...
But I might be biased here :eyeroll:
3

damo666
Posts: 3652
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 257

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#273 Post by damo666 » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:59 am

We should round everyone's points to the nearest billion.

We all won!
3

gimix
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:56 am
Karma: 37

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#274 Post by gimix » Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:17 am

Temasek22 wrote:
Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:29 am
Sorry again guys.
I think we all must still thank you, for it's been fun until it lasted. And everybody knows things happen which prevent one from doing what was planned.

Now, yes
Claesar wrote:
Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:18 am
...
B) Declare whoever with the most points the winner (including the last phase
...
But I might be biased here :eyeroll:
Just a tiny bit biased, but i think it's The Right Thing
3

tr1285
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:25 pm
Location: NJ, USA
Karma: 57

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#275 Post by tr1285 » Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:10 pm

My opinion is unless we finish the last few phases there is no real winner. Not sure how many of us want to continue though. But if Temasek can't do it, and Jamie wants to GM the rest, I'll keep playing.
2

BobMcBob
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:28 am
Location: Also Not Austalia
Karma: 200

Re: Coalition II: The Shifting Alliances

#276 Post by BobMcBob » Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:53 pm

I believe that unless we finish the remaining phases, we shouldn't declare an absolute winner (also maybe a tiny bit biased here), because the remaining phases would have allowed the rest of the players to place sanctions on any leaders (e.g. Claesar) and probably level the playing field somewhat. Claesar was by no means guaranteed to win.
3

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests