There are 2 reasons I don't say I am PR or not.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 1:31 pmWell, I was doing some re-read on our two lynch candidates.
Will start with Espresso.
D1:
He focused most of D1 on pushing Chippe for the VT proof shenanigans which is NAI to me.
He defended Teacon using meta which is also NAI considering how the last game went (where he was doc and NKed D2 after obvtowing).
He expressed an interesting observations about policy lynches that look towny to me (because it goes against most peoples opinion).
Voted Chippe all day on a policy vote, which is a bit scummy but also consistent with his posts.
N1:
Defended his policy vote but hedged on Chippe being scum.
Townread Prado but hedged on him presenting analysis, but never discussed Prado´s analysis.
Made some excuses about his low participation.
Did a good comment about Chippe being really easy to buddy.
Answered Prado in a very analytical way, which isn´t AI.
D2:
Possible townslip (or faked) about the Janitor (he didn't noticed Janitor is a one time use power).
Voted Foxcastle, without much reasoning, which is weird considering he didn't talk about Fox before.
Vote Flavius with a decent justification (at least on my opinion).
Focused a lot on mechanics and the BA, which could be a scumtell as scum is probably also interested in discovering what exactly happened at night and who BA is.
EP get really more engaged on D2 as he said he will. Not much to read on this other then he was probably honest about his RL agenda.
Claimed VT which have some meaning considering he is up to the lynch now. And his message asking et to claim if he was PR is as towny as it could be unless both are Mafia.
Will do et now:
D1:
Et stats was really timid. A bunch of jokes and questions without really objectives or following. He is a newbie, which make harder to tell if just him trying to deal with such a big game or scum trying to fly under the radar.
He questioned the votes on Chippe, specially Bozo because the lack of reasoning.
He defended a policy lynch on lurkers, which is weird to me considering he isn't really active.
Talks about voting Damo or Cru and Nepth (lurkers) but ended parking a vote on Bozo with seven hours to go saying it won't change. This is a red flag to me as town have no incentive to have anchored votes like this.
Then he said to Prado: “I wanted to lynch lurkers. But I may change vote TrP.”. This is another red flag as give him the chance to change wagon closer to EOD if needed without much explanation.
N1:
I dislike his first message after the flip. Look like he is trying to fake some surprise.
And also the second one, where he criticise Bozo for not seeking scum (how he can be so sure Chippe is town?) but at same time admits he just tunneled Bozo which is town.
Again asked a lot of questions to Nepthis, Squigs and Prado but don´t really to bother with answers.
D2:
Asked Squigs the same questions.
Focused a lot on mechanics of the night actions, which could be scummy.
After being Judge target gave some reads, mostly townie ones.
His reaction to the claim thing is interesting. He keep his options open (maybe waiting for Secretary to say something? I know it´s speculation, but can´t not to think about this).
Well, all in all, I see a lot more reasons to scumread et at this point then Expresso. His anchored vote on Bozo and the way he throw questions without really caring about the answers make me feel he is the best bet for a scum between them.
And I think we need to Lynch, with two possible NK we can't afford losing the chance to hit scum.
##vote et
1,
As I said, if one of us claim PR now, the other one(maybe VT, not scum) will be killed.
We can't get any information and lose one town.
If we don't claim now, we can see other players vote.
I think that is big information.
2,
I want to think why EP don't say himselvs role.
I anchored vote because I thought boz is scum.
Why anchoring is no insensitive?
I think scums want to keep option open near by EoD.