New Rule Regarding Game Press

Site announcements from the moderator team go here.
Message
Author
Ogion
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:21 pm
Karma: 122
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#61 Post by Ogion » Thu Nov 22, 2018 3:04 pm

leon1122 wrote:
Thu Nov 15, 2018 5:39 am
Ogion wrote:
Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:24 am
StevenC. wrote:
Wed Nov 07, 2018 10:55 pm


Uh huh.

I'm just curious what it is that they said that offended you.
Oh, just the use of the usual homophobic slurs. You know the one, and I won't repeat it. There wer some sexist ones as well. I reported them. The moderator shrugged. I surrendered my games and left their damn tournament.

I find that people who have been subject to a history like onself being murdered and oppressed for who they are have a little less tolerant attitude toward this kind of casual bigotry. And of course all decent people with a modest level of empathy. They also are sick and tired of the bullshit.
Ah, yes. I'm sure the poor, oppressed Ogion has a brutal and horrible history of being murdered.
Does having my dad enslaved by Nazis count? Let's not even get into how Americans treated the Mexicans they conquered, shall we?

But the reality is that some of us have basic human empathy, which means we don't appreciate other people being hurt. I understand that's a hard thing for you sociopaths to understand. You might try playdip. They seem more your kind of folks.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Karma: 5120
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#62 Post by Durga » Thu Nov 22, 2018 3:39 pm

Honestly, everyone I've interacted with from playdip has been really lovely. I'm sorry you had a bad experience Ogion, but the community over there is super friendly for the most part

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 21950
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 9988
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#63 Post by brainbomb » Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:37 am

ssorenn wrote:
Fri Nov 09, 2018 8:49 pm
cspieker wrote:
Fri Nov 09, 2018 8:30 pm
Why nothing about threats of physical violence?
Is there a way to crawl through the keyboard that I’m unaware of?
well the law defines terroristic threats as a felony that doesnt even have to be actionable. its about the act of threatening violence on another person via any platform to be a crime

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 21950
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 9988
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#64 Post by brainbomb » Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:39 am

As a recent victim of death threats via telephone, and the person brandished a knife and showed up at my job. hes in jail for 3 counts of felony terroristic threats and 3 counts of felony use of a weapon.

it all started with a phone call.

and yes he showed up to act on it.

and hes gonna go to prison for it.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 21950
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 9988
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#65 Post by brainbomb » Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:40 am

so can they reach thru the phone?

can they reach thru a computer?

irrelevant to the law.

User avatar
orathaic
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Karma: 394
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#66 Post by orathaic » Thu Dec 13, 2018 2:28 pm

ssorenn wrote:
Wed Oct 31, 2018 4:53 pm
still have no idea what doxxing is, but im going to do it to GHUG for sure
Doxxing comes from various horrible parts of the Internet (let's say place like 4chan), where they start out with a campaign against a particular actor, because the blame said individual for ruining their favourite film franchise.

So instead of going out and doing something positive in the world, they arrange to have many people from the website to harass the individual on twitter (or whatever public forum they can find, but twitter does little to stop harassment) with death threats and the like, until it becomes so negative the person simply withdraws from that public spaces (likely for their own mental health).

Now Doxxing is where someone in this hate group discovers (perhaps by illegal means) and publishes private information about their target. Like their home address, with the explicit intention of continuing the harassment - death threats can be sent through the mail, maybe some dangerous chemicals, or bombs, whatever... The intention is to harm. And thus it is illegal in most jurisdictions.

People have been forced to leave their homes for their own safety.

This is, the origin, at least, of Doxxing.

eturnage
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:31 pm
Karma: 27
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#67 Post by eturnage » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:39 pm

ghug wrote:
Wed Oct 31, 2018 4:42 pm
ssorenn wrote:
Wed Oct 31, 2018 3:35 pm
ssorenn wrote:
Wed Oct 31, 2018 3:34 pm


as i have yet to ever hear about doxxing, and never run across it before, maybe i dont know what it is
but yes, this place is a PC shithole
I apologise for restricting your freedoms to sexually and racially harass others.
The policy as drafted is a too vague about what objective conduct is disallowed.
1

eturnage
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:31 pm
Karma: 27
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#68 Post by eturnage » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:48 pm

"Messages of sexual nature"

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That needs to be tightened up and you need an objective standard.

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3901
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Karma: 2785
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#69 Post by bo_sox48 » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:29 pm

That is something we can best determine on a case-by-case basis. If you feel that something inappropriate in violation of this rule happened in one of your games, just email us and we'll discuss it internally and sort it out.

eturnage
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:31 pm
Karma: 27
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#70 Post by eturnage » Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:19 pm

I would amend it to read something like as follows:

"Messages of a sexually explicit nature from an objective viewpoint."

That will keep people from subjectively reacting from harmless innuendo, potentially using it to gain advantages in a game. Such behavior, while almost as reprehensible as actual explicit sexual harassment, is not illegal in a game where pretty much anything goes per the rules.

Anyway, it is just my opinion. If you want to try and handle "sexual messages" case by case, with no standard of what messages are ok and what are not, that's totally up to you guys.

bo_sox48
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3901
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:01 am
Karma: 2785
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#71 Post by bo_sox48 » Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:44 pm

I would like to think that an objective viewpoint is an implicit factor in why the moderators are actually useful. Plus, it has been made fairly clear that "harmless innuendo" is not really what we are worried about when applying this rule. All that said, I see your point, particularly where you added "explicit" to the rule.

Claesar
Posts: 1965
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:34 am
Karma: 1490
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#72 Post by Claesar » Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:50 pm

Yes, I am incapable of subjective viewpoints. I can't remember whether I was always like that (and invited to become a mod due to this trait) or it started when I became a mod. In fact, I don't remember much of my life before this.

Join us!
2

eturnage
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:31 pm
Karma: 27
Contact:

Re: New Rule Regarding Game Press

#73 Post by eturnage » Tue Dec 18, 2018 6:22 pm

bo_sox48 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:44 pm
I would like to think that an objective viewpoint is an implicit factor in why the moderators are actually useful. Plus, it has been made fairly clear that "harmless innuendo" is not really what we are worried about when applying this rule. All that said, I see your point, particularly where you added "explicit" to the rule.
Yes, that was why I proposed adding it. To make the written policy clearer and more consistent with your likely intent. Thank you for considering my suggestion.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests