MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4521 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:40 am

xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:35 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:32 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:30 am


Interesting idea. I would have thought that was a higher priority target too.
Like I said, Damo would have been my first second and third target. Did we ever figure out what happened with the extra night till the reavers were full strength?
Most likely they tried to recruit teacon, rivera, or a potential Bunny commutee N1 (you don't need to tell us yet if you have one or two commutes left). Outside chance they tried to recruit bozo N3.
Not recruit but kill. If they successfully recruited N! and N2, then they had to try to kill bozo N3. Highly unlikely, since reducing the VT pool was not something Reaver Prime wanted to do.

So they must have failed to recruit N1.

BunnyGo
Posts: 13638
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4458
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4522 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:41 am

xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:35 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:32 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:30 am


Interesting idea. I would have thought that was a higher priority target too.
Like I said, Damo would have been my first second and third target. Did we ever figure out what happened with the extra night till the reavers were full strength?
Most likely they tried to recruit teacon, rivera, or a potential Bunny commutee N1 (you don't need to tell us yet if you have one or two commutes left). Outside chance they tried to recruit bozo N3.
You think they missed N1? Maybe. I dunno why they’d go for the unclaimed PRs when it was too likely they’d hit a PR who couldn’t then provide proof.

BunnyGo
Posts: 13638
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4458
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4523 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:43 am

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:41 am
xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:35 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:32 am


Like I said, Damo would have been my first second and third target. Did we ever figure out what happened with the extra night till the reavers were full strength?
Most likely they tried to recruit teacon, rivera, or a potential Bunny commutee N1 (you don't need to tell us yet if you have one or two commutes left). Outside chance they tried to recruit bozo N3.
You think they missed N1? Maybe. I dunno why they’d go for the unclaimed PRs when it was too likely they’d hit a PR who couldn’t then provide proof.
If Tom hadn’t already died showing non-convert I would have thought she was ideal target after being shot.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4524 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:45 am

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:41 am
xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:35 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:32 am


Like I said, Damo would have been my first second and third target. Did we ever figure out what happened with the extra night till the reavers were full strength?
Most likely they tried to recruit teacon, rivera, or a potential Bunny commutee N1 (you don't need to tell us yet if you have one or two commutes left). Outside chance they tried to recruit bozo N3.
You think they missed N1? Maybe. I dunno why they’d go for the unclaimed PRs when it was too likely they’d hit a PR who couldn’t then provide proof.
So what do you suggest happened? I suppose they could have held N1. But It's unlikely that they failed to recruit N2 or N3.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4525 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:52 am

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:43 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:41 am
xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:35 am


Most likely they tried to recruit teacon, rivera, or a potential Bunny commutee N1 (you don't need to tell us yet if you have one or two commutes left). Outside chance they tried to recruit bozo N3.
You think they missed N1? Maybe. I dunno why they’d go for the unclaimed PRs when it was too likely they’d hit a PR who couldn’t then provide proof.
If Tom hadn’t already died showing non-convert I would have thought she was ideal target after being shot.
Teacon had crumbed Reader. That's a likely explanation why Mafia may have tried to kill him N1, and it could also explain why RP may have tried to recruit him N1.

BunnyGo
Posts: 13638
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4458
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4526 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:58 am

xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:52 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:43 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:41 am


You think they missed N1? Maybe. I dunno why they’d go for the unclaimed PRs when it was too likely they’d hit a PR who couldn’t then provide proof.
If Tom hadn’t already died showing non-convert I would have thought she was ideal target after being shot.
Teacon had crumbed Reader. That's a likely explanation why Mafia may have tried to kill him N1, and it could also explain why RP may have tried to recruit him N1.
Yeah. The WIFOM there was pretty thick though.

Did our doctor ever report saving? I think that’s a likely case. IIRC (on phone) they did one night. But yeah, with 0 deaths night 2, you’re probably correct they fell for the crumb.

I may have commuted a likely target one night too. Who knows, maybe I didn’t.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4527 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:11 am

The people who posted between EON3 and the GM's first Level 1 Violation announcement of D4, and who are not dead or clear, are:

peterlund
Chaqa
Jamiet
dargo

I believe dargo is "almost" clear, as I have already explained. Tem asking Mafia to shoot him supports this as well. Notably neither Tem nor teacon posted in that interval (and neither had posted at all during the whole of N3).

So, assuming that the level 1 violation occurs because of doing something, rather than because of NOT doing something, I think our top three Reaver3 suspects have to be peter/Chaqa/Jamiet. Teacon remains my top Reaver2 suspect.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13586
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Karma: 8097
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4528 Post by Chaqa » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:13 am

I’m reasonably sure the Reavers are in: teacon, peter, Jamie

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4529 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:14 am

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:58 am
xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:52 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:43 am


If Tom hadn’t already died showing non-convert I would have thought she was ideal target after being shot.
Teacon had crumbed Reader. That's a likely explanation why Mafia may have tried to kill him N1, and it could also explain why RP may have tried to recruit him N1.
Yeah. The WIFOM there was pretty thick though.

Did our doctor ever report saving? I think that’s a likely case. IIRC (on phone) they did one night. But yeah, with 0 deaths night 2, you’re probably correct they fell for the crumb.

I may have commuted a likely target one night too. Who knows, maybe I didn’t.
Jamie saved dargo N2, and he reported dargo suffered a single attack. GM confirmed that he would have known if dargo had suffered two attacks. So there's very little chance a recruitment failed N2, unless you commuted someone that night.

BunnyGo
Posts: 13638
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4458
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4530 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:24 am

xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:14 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:58 am
xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:52 am


Teacon had crumbed Reader. That's a likely explanation why Mafia may have tried to kill him N1, and it could also explain why RP may have tried to recruit him N1.
Yeah. The WIFOM there was pretty thick though.

Did our doctor ever report saving? I think that’s a likely case. IIRC (on phone) they did one night. But yeah, with 0 deaths night 2, you’re probably correct they fell for the crumb.

I may have commuted a likely target one night too. Who knows, maybe I didn’t.
Jamie saved dargo N2, and he reported dargo suffered a single attack. GM confirmed that he would have known if dargo had suffered two attacks. So there's very little chance a recruitment failed N2, unless you commuted someone that night.
Not confirming nor denying anything (unless you really want me to...then I'll consider it).

BunnyGo
Posts: 13638
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4458
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4531 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:26 am

Chaqa wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:13 am
I’m reasonably sure the Reavers are in: teacon, peter, Jamie
OK...I'll take a look at their posts and cross reference with Tem's to hypothesis hunt tonight. Did we get full compliance with my ##unvote hypothesis? I'd like everyone to do it tomorrow (doesn't count at night clearly).

BunnyGo
Posts: 13638
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4458
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4532 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:27 am

Chaqa wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:13 am
I’m reasonably sure the Reavers are in: teacon, peter, Jamie
oh...and you...

BunnyGo
Posts: 13638
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4458
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4533 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:28 am

no news on the scan yet? Is there a reason to not report early?

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4534 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:29 am

All of peter/Chaqa/Jamiet/dargo, as well as Tem, Bunny, Fox, emc and damo, posted between the first and the second level 1 violation announcements of D4. So we can't use that to narrow it down without more info. Notably teacon did not post D4 before the announcements.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4535 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:32 am

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:26 am
Chaqa wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:13 am
I’m reasonably sure the Reavers are in: teacon, peter, Jamie
OK...I'll take a look at their posts and cross reference with Tem's to hypothesis hunt tonight. Did we get full compliance with my ##unvote hypothesis? I'd like everyone to do it tomorrow (doesn't count at night clearly).
Include Chaqa in your research. He is not especially suspect, but he is one of the four people that posted between EON3 and the first level 1 violation report of D4.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4536 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:33 am

BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:28 am
no news on the scan yet? Is there a reason to not report early?
He should report as soon as possible, so we have time to make the best decision.

BunnyGo
Posts: 13638
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:21 am
Karma: 4458
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4537 Post by BunnyGo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:36 am

xorxes wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:32 am
BunnyGo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:26 am
Chaqa wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:13 am
I’m reasonably sure the Reavers are in: teacon, peter, Jamie
OK...I'll take a look at their posts and cross reference with Tem's to hypothesis hunt tonight. Did we get full compliance with my ##unvote hypothesis? I'd like everyone to do it tomorrow (doesn't count at night clearly).
Include Chaqa in your research. He is not especially suspect, but he is one of the four people that posted between EON3 and the first level 1 violation report of D4.
yes...realized that after reading your post again...

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13586
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Karma: 8097
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4538 Post by Chaqa » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:43 am

That’s fair. If there’s anything you want me to post let me know.

Waiting on damo’s scan.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4539 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 2:09 am

peterlund wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:15 pm
##vote Goldie
This was peter's only post between EON3 and the Violation announcement.

I don't really see how that could possibly "break an existing pattern".

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Karma: 1395
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#4540 Post by xorxes » Sun Jan 12, 2020 2:10 am

dargorygel wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:22 pm
goldfinger0303 wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:21 pm
When I hit Google translate in Vietnamese on my phone, that reads as "Ah it I'm not Reaver /s" or something like that
Yeah, me too.
Smh chaqa
This was dargo's only post...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TheMadMonarch and 406 guests