https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1942
what are your top 4 scum reads?xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:28 pmIf you click on the arrow, it takes you to the post being referenced.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:11 pmHow are we supposed to know what your one line means if you cut the list you are referencing? Are you trying to pocket Jamie?
And yes, I'm trying to pocket Jamie.
Yeah, but for example, here you have no idea what I'm replying to, and even if you do click upstream, those posts have also been clipped, so finding adequate context could involve clicking through 2-3 times. Inconvenient, especially when context matters and immediately let's casual readers take a second look at content that someone thinks is important when they otherwise might be too lazy to click through.
I do not believe that Jamiet is voting for me because he belives I am scum.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:38 pmI will assume everyone is voting for a scum read. Please fill in any missing information:
scum survey:
bozo: Vapor, emc, rdrivera, Nephthys
BunnyGo: emc, Kalel, bozo, brainbomb
Nephthys: Espresso, Jamie, foodcoats, bozo
Vapor: darg, Espresso, Temasek, ?
Espresso: Foxcastle, emc, Kalel, xorxes
damo: Chaqa, darg, emc, Kalel
foodcoats: brainbomb, emc, Foxcastle, Maniac
darg: Vapor, BunnyG, Kitsune, emc
Maniac: xorxes, Espresso, Kalel, ?
Kitsune: bozo, Temasek, ?, ?
rdrivera: Espresso, bozo, Kalel, Foxcastle
Temasek: Kalel, Espresso, xorxes, bozo
worcej: rdrivera, Kalel, darg, emc
brainbomb: rdrivera, Chaqa, ND, ?
Chaqa: Vapor, ?, ?, ?
emc:
Foxcastle: Espresso, ?, ?, ?
Jamie: Foxcastle, ?, ?, ?
Kalel: Espresso, ?, ?, ?
ND: Chaqa, ?, ?, ?
xorxes: Espresso, ?, ?, ?
yuuki: Chaqa, ?, ?, ?
Let's say Maniac, Espresso, bozo, yuukibozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:30 pmwhat are your top 4 scum reads?xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:28 pmIf you click on the arrow, it takes you to the post being referenced.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:11 pm
How are we supposed to know what your one line means if you cut the list you are referencing? Are you trying to pocket Jamie?
And yes, I'm trying to pocket Jamie.
bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:38 pmI will assume everyone is voting for a scum read. Please fill in any missing information:
scum survey:
Jamie: ?, Bozotheclown, Worcej, ND
if you count thanos as scum then im voting for a bad guy.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:41 pmI do not believe that Jamiet is voting for me because he belives I am scum.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:38 pmI will assume everyone is voting for a scum read. Please fill in any missing information:
scum survey:
bozo: Vapor, emc, rdrivera, Nephthys
BunnyGo: emc, Kalel, bozo, brainbomb
Nephthys: Espresso, Jamie, foodcoats, bozo
Vapor: darg, Espresso, Temasek, ?
Espresso: Foxcastle, emc, Kalel, xorxes
damo: Chaqa, darg, emc, Kalel
foodcoats: brainbomb, emc, Foxcastle, Maniac
darg: Vapor, BunnyG, Kitsune, emc
Maniac: xorxes, Espresso, Kalel, ?
Kitsune: bozo, Temasek, ?, ?
rdrivera: Espresso, bozo, Kalel, Foxcastle
Temasek: Kalel, Espresso, xorxes, bozo
worcej: rdrivera, Kalel, darg, emc
brainbomb: rdrivera, Chaqa, ND, ?
Chaqa: Vapor, ?, ?, ?
emc:
Foxcastle: Espresso, ?, ?, ?
Jamie: Foxcastle, ?, ?, ?
Kalel: Espresso, ?, ?, ?
ND: Chaqa, ?, ?, ?
xorxes: Espresso, ?, ?, ?
yuuki: Chaqa, ?, ?, ?
I think we need to strive for a golden mean.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:34 pmYeah, but for example, here you have no idea what I'm replying to, and even if you do click upstream, those posts have also been clipped, so finding adequate context could involve clicking through 2-3 times. Inconvenient, especially when context matters and immediately let's casual readers take a second look at content that someone thinks is important when they otherwise might be too lazy to click through.
Stop deleting content.
+1rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 1:18 pmMaybe I am wrong about Bozo and was right about Kitsune, this reads look so fabricated.Kitsune wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:38 pmTown:
Brain - Seems organised and driving an agenda, but also furthering discussion instead of shutting down other ideas.
Me - Well, obviously. But I mean, hmu with any of those questions you may have. I may not always be sure where I should be chiming in or not when over- or under- posting seems to upset people, but I'm generally polite enough to answer anything you decide to ask me directly. Try me! BD
Xorxes - Could be subjective, but I get a solid investigative town read from him. I'd put him in my towncore, if I was picking one. And I guess I am. So, there.
Townlean:
BunnyGo - I like his conviction, if not all the ripples from his playing style crossing most of the group's. Fairly comfortable with townlean but willing to listen to counterproposals.
Worcej - Not getting a scum vibe here with his prodding actions, but getting some weird vibes from his apparent attempts at a low profile. Possible SK vibe? If not then a solid townie.
Jamie - I don't get the scummy vibes EP was citing here. May be based on meta considerations I'm only hearing second hand. Leaning town, if a little more weakly than others.
Vapourwave - Got some weird and confusing vibes earlier, but I'm liking the way he's working on this now.
Kalel - I read him as a zealous newcomer to the webDip meta (and yes I realise the irony in me saying this). So... possible SK candidate but I don't read him as scum until he incriminates himself further.
Darg - I didn't enjoy his focus when it was on me, but I see what he's doing and I like that he's trying to progress the investigation short of clear details on how he's not.
Null:
Rdrivera, - Simply don't know yet.
ND - Simply don't know yet.
Vapour - Simply don't know yet.
Fox - I don't feel him as Scum. His lurker drive seems more like a townie with his own agenda, and he hasn't stuck to it monomaniacally which... actually improves my vibe on him.
EMC - Same. I've been him very thin on the ground in other commitments we're in togehter so I can believe he's busy however irritating that is for us.
Nephthys - Appears to be advancing the investigation, but also seemed to contradict himself once or twice. Will look forward to seeing what develops.
EspressoPatronum - I don't agree with all his conclusions, but still reading him as mistaken rather than malicious and reassured by recent comments by and about him I'm prepared to put him here.
Scumlean:
Scum:
Bozo - On reconsidering... I think I'm actually putting Bozo here now. Combination of the two heuristics, he seems to go from keeping a low profile for long periods of time to pushing his four-row agenda and trying to enlist an increasing number of the players into subscribing to his meta for the game. Maybe he's right? I'm not sure I trust him at this point. Maybe he'll up his clarity later as players who know him better are suggesting.
Temasek - Most people excusing this are saying it's just his meta, and they could well be right. I don't know it, so not judging on that and purely looking at this game I see him posting largely to no purpose and jumping onto existing wagons to try to keep his head down.
-----------------------
I'm missing four people I think. But it's late. I'll work out who I'm missing in the morning.
For now, swapping my vote to
##bozotheclown
I definitely hope I have not come off as angry!brainbomb wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:44 pmif you count thanos as scum then im voting for a bad guy.
but all the usual traits of being on a mafia team are not present in fox. hes talkative, not backing down and there seems to be little associative bullshit. hes definetely an independent actor.
but most of his play has been angry, or attacking players in categories he was part of. he was a lurker, went after lurkers for example.
I get the impression hes thanos.
nuanced read.
but I know my foxcastle pretty well. this is way way different than when he was masons with hosuke