MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

[RagingIke297]

ded game

Current reads then?

Why do you think damo interacted with you so much, particularly D1?

neph is town
durga is town
ike is scum
tham is weak town
nd is ubertown
percy is weak town
xorx is weak town
squiggs is town
fox is scum
flash is weak scum
rdr is scum
vapor is town
uhh can't remember other people

https://youtu.be/gNcJpbPHwdM

[RagingIke297]

Current reads then?

Why do you think damo interacted with you so much, particularly D1?

neph is town
durga is town
ike is scum
tham is weak town
nd is ubertown
percy is weak town
xorx is weak town
squiggs is town
fox is scum
flash is weak scum
rdr is scum
vapor is town
uhh can't remember other people

https://youtu.be/gNcJpbPHwdM

Ok well not all of it, but enough that i almost spat out my milk and donuts while reading it because I was laughing so hard

[Foxcastle]

I'm still catching up, (so sorry if this is already dealt with) but is there consensus on how we're dealing with Attorney? (Assuming he's being scanned by the party cop...)

I think the party cop should not reveal Attorney's alignment until closer to end of day (still with several hours to go, though), and only under certain circumstances.

If we are already lynching Attorney, and Attorney was either scanned as DUP or Conservative, then the party cop can sit back and let it happen. In either of those cases, we're doing the right thing.

Also, if Attorney has not become a leading wagon but the party cop has a DUP scan on him, then he should come forward so we can be sure to get the godfather. (And auto-win?)

The question is: if we are about to lynch Attorney (which I plan to support), and the party cop knows he's Labour, should he step forward and stop us? I think the party cop should not reveal in that case, so that we can continue to get scans on non-conservative claims to find the DUP. (Or is it possible that even with the party cop exposed, scum would continue to kill non-cons to avoid limited the conservative lynch pool?)

[Foxcastle]

I'm still catching up, (so sorry if this is already dealt with) but is there consensus on how we're dealing with Attorney? (Assuming he's being scanned by the party cop...)

I think the party cop should not reveal Attorney's alignment until closer to end of day (still with several hours to go, though), and only under certain circumstances.

If we are already lynching Attorney, and Attorney was either scanned as DUP or Conservative, then the party cop can sit back and let it happen. In either of those cases, we're doing the right thing.

Also, if Attorney has not become a leading wagon but the party cop has a DUP scan on him, then he should come forward so we can be sure to get the godfather. (And auto-win?)

The question is: if we are about to lynch Attorney (which I plan to support), and the party cop knows he's Labour, should he step forward and stop us? I think the party cop should not reveal in that case, so that we can continue to get scans on non-conservative claims to find the DUP. (Or is it possible that even with the party cop exposed, scum would continue to kill non-cons to avoid limited the conservative lynch pool?)

And obviously, I meant DUP/vote stealer where I typed godfather there.

[xorxes]

flash is weak scum
rdr is scum

Could you explain these two please?

[xorxes]

I'm still catching up, (so sorry if this is already dealt with) but is there consensus on how we're dealing with Attorney? (Assuming he's being scanned by the party cop...)

I think the party cop should not reveal Attorney's alignment until closer to end of day (still with several hours to go, though), and only under certain circumstances.

If we are already lynching Attorney, and Attorney was either scanned as DUP or Conservative, then the party cop can sit back and let it happen. In either of those cases, we're doing the right thing.

Also, if Attorney has not become a leading wagon but the party cop has a DUP scan on him, then he should come forward so we can be sure to get the godfather. (And auto-win?)

The question is: if we are about to lynch Attorney (which I plan to support), and the party cop knows he's Labour, should he step forward and stop us? I think the party cop should not reveal in that case, so that we can continue to get scans on non-conservative claims to find the DUP. (Or is it possible that even with the party cop exposed, scum would continue to kill non-cons to avoid limited the conservative lynch pool?)

I will respond to this in my EON post.

[Foxcastle]

I'm still catching up, (so sorry if this is already dealt with) but is there consensus on how we're dealing with Attorney? (Assuming he's being scanned by the party cop...)

I think the party cop should not reveal Attorney's alignment until closer to end of day (still with several hours to go, though), and only under certain circumstances.

If we are already lynching Attorney, and Attorney was either scanned as DUP or Conservative, then the party cop can sit back and let it happen. In either of those cases, we're doing the right thing.

Also, if Attorney has not become a leading wagon but the party cop has a DUP scan on him, then he should come forward so we can be sure to get the godfather. (And auto-win?)

The question is: if we are about to lynch Attorney (which I plan to support), and the party cop knows he's Labour, should he step forward and stop us? I think the party cop should not reveal in that case, so that we can continue to get scans on non-conservative claims to find the DUP. (Or is it possible that even with the party cop exposed, scum would continue to kill non-cons to avoid limited the conservative lynch pool?)

I will respond to this in my EON post.

Oh. Well, isn't that ominous.

[Foxcastle]

Why make that comment at all, Xorxes?

You are in a position where that kind of statement is enough to put a damper on the conversation as people wait for you to comment. Are you discouraging people from talking about it?

[xorxes]

Why make that comment at all, Xorxes?

You are in a position where that kind of statement is enough to put a damper on the conversation as people wait for you to comment. Are you discouraging people from talking about it?

I'm on my phone now and can't write much. As to why, it should be obvious. I don't want to give Mafia time to discuss how to best respond to the strategy I will propose.

[Foxcastle]

Why make that comment at all, Xorxes?

You are in a position where that kind of statement is enough to put a damper on the conversation as people wait for you to comment. Are you discouraging people from talking about it?

OH. It's because Neph is already party cop. Ha.

[worcej]

Why does everyone state the town-thing out loud when they realize it?!

[Foxcastle]

Why does everyone state the town-thing out loud when they realize it?!

?

[RagingIke297]

Why does everyone state the town-thing out loud when they realize it?!

Isn't that step 4 in the "10 steps to being a townie" book?

[xorxes]

Why does everyone state the town-thing out loud when they realize it?!

?

No idea what he's talking about either

[Foxcastle]

I assume he's talking about how I was reading along, hadn't gotten to EOD yesterday, and the corrected something as I learned what had happened.

But also, I'd rather people say the town-thing out loud, where it can be seen and questioned. Scum silence and town silence both sound the same.

[Nephthys]

@Attorney, just to confirm, are you con or not con?

[RagingIke297]

@Attorney, just to confirm, are you con or not con?

@Nephthys, just to confirm, you think you won't be role blocked or night killed?

[Nephthys]

@Attorney, just to confirm, are you con or not con?

@Nephthys, just to confirm, you think you won't be role blocked or night killed?

I do think that I will be. Why wouldn't they...

[RagingIke297]

@Attorney, just to confirm, are you con or not con?

@Nephthys, just to confirm, you think you won't be role blocked or night killed?

I do think that I will be. Why wouldn't they...

Right, so why does it matter? Attorney is currently claiming Non-con I believe btw

[xorxes]

@Nephthys, just to confirm, you think you won't be role blocked or night killed?

I do think that I will be. Why wouldn't they...

Right, so why does it matter? Attorney is currently claiming Non-con I believe btw

Yes, he is, and independently of what he is claiming, that's who the Party Cop should be visiting anyways.