webdiplomacy.net

I would also be excited to hear the case on me.

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:52 pm

@Ike - why did you ask for input and ultimately didn't do it. What made you not want to shoot ghug, who multiple people commented on as a shot option?

I asked for imput to see what people would say, there were all kinds of suggestions, like 4 or 5 different ones. It happens that I thought I was most likely to hit scum by shooting a lurker. Ive already said that I didnt like a ghug shot, he's probably going to die within a few days, again just a reiteration.

This feels pretty opertunistic by Worcej

ghug wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:38 pm

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:37 pm

And to be clear, Ike has yet to respond to my question about Ezio as his choice. Am I the only one wondering why it was Ezio specifically over anyone else?

How come you didn't respond to my question?

##VOTE worcej

I literally did... go read better.

Nephthys wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:28 pm

Can someone outline the case against FoxC for me?

We dont like him

RagingIke297 wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:43 pm

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:52 pm

@Ike - why did you ask for input and ultimately didn't do it. What made you not want to shoot ghug, who multiple people commented on as a shot option?

I asked for imput to see what people would say, there were all kinds of suggestions, like 4 or 5 different ones. It happens that I thought I was most likely to hit scum by shooting a lurker. Ive already said that I didnt like a ghug shot, he's probably going to die within a few days, again just a reiteration.

This feels pretty opertunistic by Worcej

Get him get him get him

ghug wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:32 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:31 pm

Nephthys wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:29 pm

Phase is normal length until proven otherwise? Why would we not continue?

No, for fucks sake.... my question is why was nobody concerned about this? Why was there no urgency to get meaningful votes in?

For much the same reason few people take meaningful action to reduce their personal contributions to climate change.

I have reduced my farting output by 15% over the last 2 days.

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:43 pm

ghug wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:38 pm

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:37 pm

And to be clear, Ike has yet to respond to my question about Ezio as his choice. Am I the only one wondering why it was Ezio specifically over anyone else?

How come you didn't respond to my question?

##VOTE worcej

I literally did... go read better.

Oh, you did.

Why didn't you answer it better?

VOTE TALLY 1.9
MODBOT IS INACCURATE (Damo vote was nullified due to lack of specificity)

Foxcastle (3) xorxes Vecna Squigs44
bozotheclown (3) LordQuas rdrivera2005 Foxcastle
LordQuas (2) dargorygel DrCJG
damo666 (2) Jamiet99uk DemonRHK
No‑Lynch (2) bozotheclown RagingIke297
Nephthys (1) CrimsonFox
Jamiet99uk (1) ND
ghug (1) Nephthys
RagingIke297 (1) worcej
worcej (1) ghug

End-votes (0/10)

Non-votes
DoubtingThomas
damo666

NO ONE is scheduled to die
15 minutes remain

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:38 pm

Nephthys wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:32 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:31 pm

No, for fucks sake.... my question is why was nobody concerned about this? Why was there no urgency to get meaningful votes in?

Plus I'm going out on a limb saying that most of us (myself included) haven't in depth read the PM list. Even though I came up with the initial Mayan idea I didn't even really consider it until I saw your post.

Then most of us (yourself included) are a bunch of lazy, ignorant fucks who should play Tetris instead.

I get constantly berated and abused for my play style but at least I try. At least I read the setup. At least I show up for more than 10 minutes a day. At least I care about the game. Sometimes I wonder why you fuckers sign up in the first place.

Really starting to wonder again if this shit is fabricated.

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:37 pm

And to be clear, Ike has yet to respond to my question about Ezio as his choice. Am I the only one wondering why it was Ezio specifically over anyone else?

Out of Ezio, DrCJG, DT, darg and RHK, I felt like Ezio was most likely to be scum.

RagingIke297 wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:43 pm

I asked for imput to see what people would say, there were all kinds of suggestions, like 4 or 5 different ones. It happens that I thought I was most likely to hit scum by shooting a lurker. Ive already said that I didnt like a ghug shot, he's probably going to die within a few days, again just a reiteration.

This feels pretty opertunistic by Worcej

Okay, so why Ezio?

I wouldn't be grilling you for your choice if it was a fact that you are town, but in this setup the D1 Vig is town or scum. I don't consider that being opportunistic, I consider that holding you more accountable for your choice to try to deduce if you are actually town.

ghug wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:45 pm

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:43 pm

ghug wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:38 pm

How come you didn't respond to my question?

##VOTE worcej

I literally did... go read better.

Oh, you did.

Why didn't you answer it better?

Because I speak American good.

##VOTE Foxcastle

I am OK lynching Foxcastle today, especially over me.

how the fuck is lordQuak in the top3 leading wagons again? That is some abysmal shit.

Vecna wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:43 pm

Nephthys wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:28 pm

Can someone outline the case against FoxC for me?

We dont like him

RagingIke297 wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:46 pm

worcej wrote: ↑

Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:37 pm

And to be clear, Ike has yet to respond to my question about Ezio as his choice. Am I the only one wondering why it was Ezio specifically over anyone else?

Out of Ezio, DrCJG, DT, darg and RHK, I felt like Ezio was most likely to be scum.

We cross posted, so Ezio was more scum because of his posts over those guys? Is that what you're trying to imply?

##vote no lynch

This shit is also hilarious.

I think Squigs is being opportunistic here, which combined with the uncharacteristic lack of participation == ##VOTE SQUIGS

##VOTE bozo

##vote FoxCastle