webdiplomacy.net

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pm

One person has not cast a vote.

Can you guess who it is?

*drumroll* .............. it's emc, isn't it?!

EspressoPatronum wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:00 pm

I have to head to class for a few hours. I'll be back in the last 30-60 mins of the day.

I will think about it, Espresso. Same for me, will be back in the last hour of the day

@ND where are you, why are you so absent this phase?
Do something please, or you will be turned into paste.
You have done nothing but shitpost and over-react to Chaqa.

EspressoPatronum wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:00 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pm

One person has not cast a vote.

Can you guess who it is?

*drumroll* .............. it's emc, isn't it?!

Well guessed.

As a reward you may help yourself to a potato.

OK, I'm off. Back in about 8-9 hours. Then I'm gone for about 24 hours.

Who wants to put together a fun new wagon on ND?
I'd love that.

xorxes wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:31 pm

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:10 am

rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 1:13 am

I can always join a bozo lynch.

##vote Bozo

Interesting that 50% of my top 4 scum reads chose to vote for me instead of participating in my survey. Only scum would want to avoid coming up with 4 scum reads. Your confidence level does not have to be high. List everyone from most likely to least likely scum, and take the first 4.

Is it at all likley that two scum would initiate a wagon on you? Are they trying to save Espresso (top wagon at the time) or what other motivation would they have for being so blatant?

I do not know if their voting for me is a good reason to further suspect them, but neither voted for me until I listed them in my top 4 scum reads.

xorxes wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:46 pm

bozotheclown wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:49 am

Here are the reasons for my top scum reads. Keep in mind it is early and there is not a lot to go on yet:

Vapor: I find him saying he is going to limit his posts suspicious. Also, he received 3 quick votes, that could be a sign of a teammate bussing him.

emc: He referenced his own meta, which I find is typically scum indicative.

rdrivera: Voting for 2 new players for vague reasons seems atypical for him as town.

Nephthys: This post seems like scum taking an easy shot, and it is not logically consistent:

Nephthys wrote: ↑

Tue Sep 17, 2019 6:29 am

Calling it now

Espresso/bozo scumteam

I could see Nephthys think Espresso is trying to pocket me, or think I am scum for other reasons, but scum almost never look like they are pocketing other scum.

The second reason for suspecting Vapor is horrible. The reason for suspecting emc is as weak as it can get. The reason for suspecting Neph is horrible.

I'm still unsure about rivera.

You are incorrect, especially on Nephthys. Whether he is scum or not, my reason for suspecting him is valid.

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pm

One person has not cast a vote.

Can you guess who it is?

OH BOY OH BOY I THINK I KNOW WHO IT COULD BE!

xorxes wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:54 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 1:18 pm

Kitsune wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:38 pm

Maybe I am wrong about Bozo and was right about Kitsune, this reads look so fabricated.

I just complimented him for them looking genuine.

We have really different reads about this game. But this give you some town points as I can't see scum Xorxes complimenting such a bad list from a scum partner.

xorxes wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:57 pm

Chaqa wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:33 pm

ND is clearly going to lurk his way to safety (which is rich coming from me, I know) so I guess I'll move to a different wagon. I think all the wagons right now are reasonable, but I'll hop onto Vapor.

##Vote Vaporwave

Also, someone else brought it up (xorxes maybe?) but brainbomb is not playing quite exactly how I'm used to him playing. Curious.

It wasn't me. I do agree however that bb is a bit changed, but in a good way, and I'm townreading him.

It was me and I am still puzzled about BB.

rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:52 pm

I confess I am getting mixed vibes from you Xorxes. This comment about me is exactly what Maniac described on his case on you. Subtle shading. Manipulating without really pushing.

I am not going to push either you or bozo today, but I don't have a townlean on either of you, and I think at least one of you might be scum. There's nothing subtle or manipulative about that, it's as clear as I can make it.

##GM note:

Sorry I haven't been around kids, I had an absolute whirlwind of a day yesterday. Laptop is set up and I will be answering GM calls shortly and getting a vote count out.

Coming up from exactly 30 pages behind at this point, skimmed up to catch :D

really, really simple feelings without any particular data yet -

could vapor be sk lmao
There's still a tingly sense from him, there's...something bout him, dunno what. but the following posts have mostly overrode start.

bozo has been, like several others pointed out, rather lackluster so far.

rivera doesn't seem like scum (unlike last game, when he was very ping-worthy in terms of gut feel). I like rivera so far.

Kit and Chaqa are correct in the lack of emc online :P
procrastination hit like a shitty high drop on a yellowing mattress

(speaking of that Chaqa did Aurelin get pissed and sub me out lol - put me baaack. put me baaaackk)

Maniac has issues with quoting and formatting. Can't tell if he's just unfamiliar or purposefully obfuscating in format to cover for actual content. Pings me since I have done same in past as scum or just being lazy. Or just out of touch with stuff.

bungo came in strangely aggressive against brain's meta for someone who's purportedly new lol (I assume he's read some of the triple agent game, but that's really unrepresentative imo). Have you skimmed past games? Know him from some other site?

I actually like Neph's proposal, although it'll be absolute hell for me to do lmao
bozo proposed idea a phase or so too early I feel, kind of lazy-ish? eh

ND did say last time he pre-rands an meta to act in-thread for games, will assume it's that for now, but he has made less "useful" comments than when playing casual meta in past.

Note to whoever said I made a bunch of anchorish posts, there was a singular one lol. why specify me in particular, when there have been others with more imo?

others in post continuing after;

Foxcastle wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:46 pm

BunnyGo wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:36 pm

xorxes wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:23 pm

Townie points for this reads list as well.

+1 for clipping

-1 for clipping. Clipping erases information. Clipping makes it harder for people to actually see the context of what's being said. Clipping is anti-town.

Disagree. If one is commenting on something specific in a big wall of text the rest of which is not important to that which is being discussed then clipping is very helpful.

xorxes wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:23 pm

Kitsune wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:38 pm

Townie points for this reads list as well.

How are we supposed to know what your one line means if you cut the list you are referencing? Are you trying to pocket Jamie?

Foxcastle wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:06 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pm

One person has not cast a vote.

Can you guess who it is?

OH BOY OH BOY I THINK I KNOW WHO IT COULD BE!

What is this amazing deductive reasoning? I have no clue who it could be :o

EspressoPatronum wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:57 pm

@Fox, I don't have enough time for a full reply. You're clearly twisting my argument to fit your agenda. You're drawing conclusions from words I haven't said, and you have no defence to my point about scum!Fox positioning with lurking. Instead, you keep trying to switch the narrative back against me.
- Your suspicious playstyle makes you an ideal lylo candidate (as seen in M47), so I don't see how that helps your case in exonerating yourself.

My goodness, it's almost as if I'm playing a game in which players analyze other players, read between the lines, and make inferences and arguments!

In other shocking news, Foxcastle thinks that scum tend to lurk, and then... DUN DUN DUUUN! sees a lurker looking scummy and votes him! Who. Does. That???

I responded to your points and defended myself on page 42. If you're just going to blather on like I never did, there's no point in engaging with you.

Foxcastle wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:06 pm

Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pm

One person has not cast a vote.

Can you guess who it is?

OH BOY OH BOY I THINK I KNOW WHO IT COULD BE!

Espresso is already enjoying his victory potato, you are too late.

xorxes wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:08 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:52 pm

I confess I am getting mixed vibes from you Xorxes. This comment about me is exactly what Maniac described on his case on you. Subtle shading. Manipulating without really pushing.

I am not going to push either you or bozo today, but I don't have a townlean on either of you, and I think at least one of you might be scum. There's nothing subtle or manipulative about that, it's as clear as I can make it.

Now it's clear. Your last post about me and Bozo was saying that it isn't true me and Bozo very often misread each other and it was not clear if you thought I was lying or if you thought I was right about Bozo and later you could choose the option that fits better.

We have also a tendency of misread the other and I am also not wanting to push you today.