Re: Clue: It's emc
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:00 pm
*drumroll* .............. it's emc, isn't it?!Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pmOne person has not cast a vote.
Can you guess who it is?
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1942
*drumroll* .............. it's emc, isn't it?!Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pmOne person has not cast a vote.
Can you guess who it is?
I will think about it, Espresso. Same for me, will be back in the last hour of the dayEspressoPatronum wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:00 pmI have to head to class for a few hours. I'll be back in the last 30-60 mins of the day.
Well guessed.EspressoPatronum wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:00 pm*drumroll* .............. it's emc, isn't it?!Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pmOne person has not cast a vote.
Can you guess who it is?
I do not know if their voting for me is a good reason to further suspect them, but neither voted for me until I listed them in my top 4 scum reads.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:31 pmIs it at all likley that two scum would initiate a wagon on you? Are they trying to save Espresso (top wagon at the time) or what other motivation would they have for being so blatant?bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:10 amInteresting that 50% of my top 4 scum reads chose to vote for me instead of participating in my survey. Only scum would want to avoid coming up with 4 scum reads. Your confidence level does not have to be high. List everyone from most likely to least likely scum, and take the first 4.
You are incorrect, especially on Nephthys. Whether he is scum or not, my reason for suspecting him is valid.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:46 pmThe second reason for suspecting Vapor is horrible. The reason for suspecting emc is as weak as it can get. The reason for suspecting Neph is horrible.bozotheclown wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:49 amHere are the reasons for my top scum reads. Keep in mind it is early and there is not a lot to go on yet:
Vapor: I find him saying he is going to limit his posts suspicious. Also, he received 3 quick votes, that could be a sign of a teammate bussing him.
emc: He referenced his own meta, which I find is typically scum indicative.
rdrivera: Voting for 2 new players for vague reasons seems atypical for him as town.
Nephthys: This post seems like scum taking an easy shot, and it is not logically consistent:
I could see Nephthys think Espresso is trying to pocket me, or think I am scum for other reasons, but scum almost never look like they are pocketing other scum.
I'm still unsure about rivera.
OH BOY OH BOY I THINK I KNOW WHO IT COULD BE!Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pmOne person has not cast a vote.
Can you guess who it is?
We have really different reads about this game. But this give you some town points as I can't see scum Xorxes complimenting such a bad list from a scum partner.
It was me and I am still puzzled about BB.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:57 pmIt wasn't me. I do agree however that bb is a bit changed, but in a good way, and I'm townreading him.Chaqa wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:33 pmND is clearly going to lurk his way to safety (which is rich coming from me, I know) so I guess I'll move to a different wagon. I think all the wagons right now are reasonable, but I'll hop onto Vapor.
##Vote Vaporwave
Also, someone else brought it up (xorxes maybe?) but brainbomb is not playing quite exactly how I'm used to him playing. Curious.
I am not going to push either you or bozo today, but I don't have a townlean on either of you, and I think at least one of you might be scum. There's nothing subtle or manipulative about that, it's as clear as I can make it.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:52 pm
I confess I am getting mixed vibes from you Xorxes. This comment about me is exactly what Maniac described on his case on you. Subtle shading. Manipulating without really pushing.
Disagree. If one is commenting on something specific in a big wall of text the rest of which is not important to that which is being discussed then clipping is very helpful.
What is this amazing deductive reasoning? I have no clue who it could be :oFoxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:06 pmOH BOY OH BOY I THINK I KNOW WHO IT COULD BE!Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pmOne person has not cast a vote.
Can you guess who it is?
My goodness, it's almost as if I'm playing a game in which players analyze other players, read between the lines, and make inferences and arguments!EspressoPatronum wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:57 pm@Fox, I don't have enough time for a full reply. You're clearly twisting my argument to fit your agenda. You're drawing conclusions from words I haven't said, and you have no defence to my point about scum!Fox positioning with lurking. Instead, you keep trying to switch the narrative back against me.
- Your suspicious playstyle makes you an ideal lylo candidate (as seen in M47), so I don't see how that helps your case in exonerating yourself.
Espresso is already enjoying his victory potato, you are too late.Foxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:06 pmOH BOY OH BOY I THINK I KNOW WHO IT COULD BE!Jamiet99uk wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:59 pmOne person has not cast a vote.
Can you guess who it is?
Now it's clear. Your last post about me and Bozo was saying that it isn't true me and Bozo very often misread each other and it was not clear if you thought I was lying or if you thought I was right about Bozo and later you could choose the option that fits better.xorxes wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:08 pmI am not going to push either you or bozo today, but I don't have a townlean on either of you, and I think at least one of you might be scum. There's nothing subtle or manipulative about that, it's as clear as I can make it.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:52 pm
I confess I am getting mixed vibes from you Xorxes. This comment about me is exactly what Maniac described on his case on you. Subtle shading. Manipulating without really pushing.