Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:14 pm
ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:41 pmAlso, anybody can get pissed off at me - it's really NAI
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1660
ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:41 pmAlso, anybody can get pissed off at me - it's really NAI
Doesn't this violate his win condition? ##CALL GM, would you mind commenting on that?
Terminology-wise, none of those numbers are in "lurker" territory. Not even close. I was gone n1-n2 for IRL travel reasons, so do the math excluding the time I was gone. See what you get compared to d4.ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:59 pmYou made 157 posts in the first 3 days and 3 nights (that's 216 hours) - in the first 47 hours of Day 4, you've made 107 posts (as a lynch candidate). If that doesn't highlight the degree you're lurking, than I don't know what does.
I think that connor has a sligthly better chance of being town.teacon7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 3:48 pm@flav
@nd
@peterlund
@neph
@fox
@percy
@chippe
@whichever of damo/connor is town
I have a strong guess as to the identity of the BA. Is it worth me guessing aloud about it? I don't want to give scum the right person to rb and potentially block them from killing off scum.
I know. But I figured putting in the y would help people with understanding my statement.damo666 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:14 pmyou were right first timeChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:11 pmscummyness*ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:11 pm
That's a fucking dumb excuse - stupidity doesn't explain scumminess.
There are two parts to solving and focusing on one or the other is bad. Let's say Fox is the analytical side, Flav is more the feelings/vibes side, and Xorxes is a perfect blend of the two.
Are we going from the start of N1 to the end of N2? Please clarify what should be excluded.teacon7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:15 pmTerminology-wise, none of those numbers are in "lurker" territory. Not even close. I was gone n1-n2 for IRL travel reasons, so do the math excluding the time I was gone. See what you get compared to d4.ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:59 pmYou made 157 posts in the first 3 days and 3 nights (that's 216 hours) - in the first 47 hours of Day 4, you've made 107 posts (as a lynch candidate). If that doesn't highlight the degree you're lurking, than I don't know what does.
wincons aren't individualistic, they're team-based. So it makes sense to self-vote if he thinks I'd be better for town later in the game, or that he'd be worse for town later in the game.ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:14 pmDoesn't this violate his win condition? ##CALL GM, would you mind commenting on that?
I don't know who is more scummy. Fox for voting himself, or teacon for telling him not to on the chance teacon is scumteacon7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:18 pmwincons aren't individualistic, they're team-based. So it makes sense to self-vote if he thinks I'd be better for town later in the game, or that he'd be worse for town later in the game.ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:14 pmDoesn't this violate his win condition? ##CALL GM, would you mind commenting on that?
@fox you probably shouldn't do that though, on the chance that I actually am scum. doug judy or whatever.
start of n1 to end of n2 is good enough for ballpark math. I can get exact times after I finish typing up my wall of reads.ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:17 pmAre we going from the start of N1 to the end of N2? Please clarify what should be excluded.teacon7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:15 pmTerminology-wise, none of those numbers are in "lurker" territory. Not even close. I was gone n1-n2 for IRL travel reasons, so do the math excluding the time I was gone. See what you get compared to d4.ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:59 pmYou made 157 posts in the first 3 days and 3 nights (that's 216 hours) - in the first 47 hours of Day 4, you've made 107 posts (as a lynch candidate). If that doesn't highlight the degree you're lurking, than I don't know what does.
I still think that wincon is sketchy though.teacon7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:18 pmwincons aren't individualistic, they're team-based. So it makes sense to self-vote if he thinks I'd be better for town later in the game, or that he'd be worse for town later in the game.ChippeRock wrote: ↑Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:14 pmDoesn't this violate his win condition? ##CALL GM, would you mind commenting on that?
@fox you probably shouldn't do that though, on the chance that I actually am scum. doug judy or whatever.