Re: M1021 - Blessings of Lilia - GAME THREAD [hidden]
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:48 pm
@celaph why are you voting rdr?
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/
https://webdiplomacy.net/contrib/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3915
I just remembered I'm still TFB and that's a bit silly given they're not one of my top 3 picks. ##vote damo for now.aarodactyl wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:22 pmmy order is probably damo > durga > snowy > everyone else in some order.TheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:09 pmSo given you have a list of people you'd be sad to miskill in some sort of order and a clearly ordered scum reads list who do you want to kill today?aarodactyl wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:07 pm
That's not what I said. I'd be sadder to miskill most people more than Maniac. However, I'd definitely rather get scum over miskilling Maniac. So if I think someone is scummy enough and Maniac is towny enough, I'm not going to vote for him.
I think Sabi is being very solve-y right now and I'm guessing will continue to be. And then for TFB and Jamie, my impression is that they don't lose steam late game which is a huge problem for town.
That's basically the scum list I gave in my reads except for snowy. I haven't played with them but I agree with Jamie that it's annoying for them to sandbag D1. So that makes them more killable in my book.
I also find it really weird that Damo went from saying my post made me town to then suggesting to start a wagon on me.
Does killing aaro D1 encourage him to play more mafia because it will be over quickly or does it free him from his duties this game to never play again?
Because I thought pretty much all of it was right with a slight quibble on severity (he seems to be somewhere between null and slight scum on it, while I am slight scum to scum on it). I can't win with you though. I post long form stuff with all the caveats you seem to want and you say you can't be bothered to read anything I write.Durga wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:36 pmIf you think only a part of celaph's analysis was right why would you state celaph is right with no context provided. I don't get it. Who does that? You clearly either didn't think it through, want to buddy celaph, or didn't read it properly, or all of it, idk!
buddying me again smhcelaph wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:13 pmThis is a copout. You knew nothing about me last game and yet had no problem speculating on my lack of night posts. You had obviously spotted a difference in behavior between Damo games. How does that make you feel?
Side note: even without the added thoughts, I do think that it reflects well on Pyxxy for bringing this up. Maybe he's just better at being mafia than me (not hard), but I think it shows a desire to resolve damo to go compare his posts to last game and highlight a difference.
Maybe I can say one thing about this game.pyxxy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 5:30 amdamo's first post from the previous game (M73)
vs.
damo's first post in this game
damo666 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:07 amI can understand not reading Kak's lengthy early posts (I haven't, I assume they are pre prepared and NAI) but I do not understand why people would not read the set up. You cannot play the game optimally if you are unfamiliar with the set up and claiming not to have done so is lazy at best and a scumplay hinting at VT at worst.
vote durga
Not the emotional appeal. Please. Celaph is right when he says xyz is all you need. There's a middle ground between three words and three thousand.TheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:53 pmBecause I thought pretty much all of it was right with a slight quibble on severity (he seems to be somewhere between null and slight scum on it, while I am slight scum to scum on it). I can't win with you though. I post long form stuff with all the caveats you seem to want and you say you can't be bothered to read anything I write.Durga wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:36 pmIf you think only a part of celaph's analysis was right why would you state celaph is right with no context provided. I don't get it. Who does that? You clearly either didn't think it through, want to buddy celaph, or didn't read it properly, or all of it, idk!
I try to post short things for you to read after you advised me to post shorter and complained that even my single paragraph comments were too long when I talked to you at the end of last game. You also said that if people can't figure it out that it is their problem. Despite that you then come at me with the exact problem I cite happening when I don't preemptively couch my analysis with every caveat I have.
What do you want me to do lmao?
Oh c'mon you have no right to complain about emotional appeals after you used emotional appeals to shut me up last night lmaoDurga wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:56 pmNot the emotional appeal. Please. Celaph is right when he says xyz is all you need. There's a middle ground between three words and three thousand.TheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:53 pmBecause I thought pretty much all of it was right with a slight quibble on severity (he seems to be somewhere between null and slight scum on it, while I am slight scum to scum on it). I can't win with you though. I post long form stuff with all the caveats you seem to want and you say you can't be bothered to read anything I write.Durga wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:36 pmIf you think only a part of celaph's analysis was right why would you state celaph is right with no context provided. I don't get it. Who does that? You clearly either didn't think it through, want to buddy celaph, or didn't read it properly, or all of it, idk!
I try to post short things for you to read after you advised me to post shorter and complained that even my single paragraph comments were too long when I talked to you at the end of last game. You also said that if people can't figure it out that it is their problem. Despite that you then come at me with the exact problem I cite happening when I don't preemptively couch my analysis with every caveat I have.
What do you want me to do lmao?
LOL fair but fuck stop tunnelingTheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:57 pmOh c'mon you have no right to complain about emotional appeals after you used emotional appeals to shut me up last night lmaoDurga wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:56 pmNot the emotional appeal. Please. Celaph is right when he says xyz is all you need. There's a middle ground between three words and three thousand.TheFlyingBoat wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:53 pm
Because I thought pretty much all of it was right with a slight quibble on severity (he seems to be somewhere between null and slight scum on it, while I am slight scum to scum on it). I can't win with you though. I post long form stuff with all the caveats you seem to want and you say you can't be bothered to read anything I write.
I try to post short things for you to read after you advised me to post shorter and complained that even my single paragraph comments were too long when I talked to you at the end of last game. You also said that if people can't figure it out that it is their problem. Despite that you then come at me with the exact problem I cite happening when I don't preemptively couch my analysis with every caveat I have.
What do you want me to do lmao?
There were almost two hours between Damo's posts. It doesn't seem unreasonable for his opinion to change in that time. I'm more bothered by the fact that your response gives me the vibes that you are annoyed to be made a wagon instead of thinking through whether Damo was scum because of the switch.aarodactyl wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:22 pmI also find it really weird that Damo went from saying my post made me town to then suggesting to start a wagon on me.
See celaph? No need to buddy me.rdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:51 pmWell, finally catched up.
I don't scumread Celaph, in fact I townread him, so I need to change my vote.
Between Boat and Durga I would probably vote Boat, but I would rather ##vote Aaro for real this time.
I could also vote pyxxy, but I would rather give him another day, maybe I expected too much after last game.
Sick alright I won't do anything for the rest of D1, time to coast bona really does lead by example
I dunno, I lean hard town on tfbrdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:51 pmWell, finally catched up.
I don't scumread Celaph, in fact I townread him, so I need to change my vote.
Between Boat and Durga I would probably vote Boat, but I would rather ##vote Aaro for real this time.
I could also vote pyxxy, but I would rather give him another day, maybe I expected too much after last game.
Really. Why? I confess I have trouble reading TFB and I lean town on Durga based on meta (which isn't great I know, but it's what I got).snowy801 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:05 pmI dunno, I lean hard town on tfbrdrivera2005 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 8:51 pmWell, finally catched up.
I don't scumread Celaph, in fact I townread him, so I need to change my vote.
Between Boat and Durga I would probably vote Boat, but I would rather ##vote Aaro for real this time.
I could also vote pyxxy, but I would rather give him another day, maybe I expected too much after last game.
##vote Aaro
For 2 reasons: