An Omnipresent Solid Chocolate Egg

[damo666]

What would be 'outside' it?

Would it have an outside?

Could you eat it?

Would it be interdimensional or intradimensional?

Would it call itself Brian? Or Keith?

Would it melt?

If it was sentient would it think "What's the point?"

Do you believe in such an entity?

[Percy Williams]

There's already a thread for this, "what is agnostic to you? "

[damo666]

No. This is completely different.

[Foxcastle]

What would be 'outside' it?
The foil wrapper, of course.

Would it have an outside?


Could you eat it?
Is it edible? Yes. Could you eat all of it? In theory, yes. In practice, no.

Would it be interdimensional or intradimensional?
Unlikely.

Would it call itself Brian? Or Keith?
No.

Would it melt?\
Under the force of gravity, it would collapse in on itself to form a massive, all-consuming, self-consuming black hole. This would happen so quickly from instantiation that it would likely not have time to melt, transitioning almost immediately from egg to egg-plasma and other exotic matter.

If it was sentient would it think "What's the point?"
No. It has a purpose, and it knows it.

Do you believe in such an entity?
In the multiverse all things are possible, so this is certain.

[damo666]

What would be 'outside' it?
The foil wrapper, of course.

Would it have an outside?


Could you eat it?
Is it edible? Yes. Could you eat all of it? In theory, yes. In practice, no.

Would it be interdimensional or intradimensional?
Unlikely.

Would it call itself Brian? Or Keith?
No.

Would it melt?\
Under the force of gravity, it would collapse in on itself to form a massive, all-consuming, self-consuming black hole. This would happen so quickly from instantiation that it would likely not have time to melt, transitioning almost immediately from egg to egg-plasma and other exotic matter.

If it was sentient would it think "What's the point?"
No. It has a purpose, and it knows it.

Do you believe in such an entity?
In the multiverse all things are possible, so this is certain.

1. Wrong. No space for foil.
2. Obviously not.
3. Of course not. Edibility irrelevant.But your answer does have some merit.
4. Yes, likely to be unlikely.
5. Correct. It calls itself Arbuthnot.
6. Perfect answer. 10/10
7. Hmmm.
8. Not if it's finite. Or even infinite but bounded (I think).

[yavuzovic]

Why is there a thread about my son? And why are you asking if he's edible?

[dargorygel]

This is eggsactly correct.
(come on, you were all thinking it...)

[Vaporwave]

Thought you weren't big on chocolate, damo! Now you fantasize about some giant egg?

You do love choco, don't you?

this is like me saying I can't trust blondes and wanna stay away from them, but all I want are blonde girls

[e.m.c^42]

1. The pure conception of an "outside", no more and no less.
2. See the above
3. Chegg exists for the moment of consumption.
4. Chegg exists however it is being eaten.
5. Chegg would be named damo.
6. Chegg will melt if the eater knows it to melt.
7. Chegg is a perfect chocolate egg, it knows cheggself to have no points.
8. Such an entity no longer exists, as I ate mine around 6 years ago.

[damo666]

@EMC did it take a finite amount of time to eat?

[damo666]

@Vapor no not particularly. I'd prefer an infinitely long bar of nougat. (To the egg).

[damo666]

Would its existence (the egg) imply an omnipresent chocolate chicken?
Before anyone asks the order of existence is immaterial.

[BobMcBob]

Would its existence (the egg) imply an omnipresent chocolate chicken?
Before anyone asks the order of existence is immaterial.

Is the order of existence immaterial? :)

And it would indeed imply an omnipresent chocolate chicken.
This may seem odd, because as we all know, an egg (especially a chocolate one) doesn't by necessity imply a chicken (even a chocolate one). Although we all know chocolate chickens lay chocolate eggs, chocolate eggs do not necessitate chocolate chickens, because chocolate eggs can be made through other means than laying (e.g. melting down a chocolate camel and reforming it into a chocolate egg).

However, these so-called chocolate eggs are merely inferior imitations of real chocolate eggs, and thus any chocolate eggs made by alternate methods are inherently flawed. And an omnipresent chocolate egg wouldn't be flawed, would it?

Therefore, the existence of an omnipresent chocolate egg would indeed necessitate an omnipresent chocolate chicken (because the non-infinite cannot give birth to the infinite). Now all that's left is to find that elusive egg.

[damo666]

It's everywhere. It's omnipresent!

[BobMcBob]

It's everywhere. It's omnipresent!

Wait, that's right...