1v1 - new rule proposal in case of tie Most players are conviced that : - in FvA : A is a little bit stronger than F - in GvI : G is quite stronger than I. That's an issue because in case of tie, the player who get A (resp. G) is advantaged. I suggest the following new principle in case of tie. ---...

wpfieps wrote: ↑

Sat Mar 09, 2019 2:59 pm

........
"We want this to be the best site for playing diplomacy online", the site owners used to say. Epic fail.

So, if this isn't the best site for playing diplomacy online, which site is, and what in your opinion makes it better?

Balki Bartokomous wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 17, 2018 12:47 am

Durga wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 17, 2018 12:11 am

Don't put me on that list, I was just a sub, makes it look like I did bad :p

Same for me. I was just a sub, and my position is an embarrassment.

Balki, I think you subbed for me, and I thought we did pretty well! Sorry to hear you are embarrassed by it

71. Who is next? 70. Won by breaca (G) vs Schultzbrigade (I) 69. Won by breaca (G) vs Eric1982 (I) 68. Won by Eric1982 (G) vs cspieker (I) 67. Won by cspieker (G) vs Maximus c23 (I) 66. Won by cspieker (I) vs badivan1 (G) 65. Won by cspieker (G) vs Gocki (I) 64. Won by cspieker (I) vs ZergSlayer (G)...

71. Who is next? 70. Won by breaca (G) vs Schultzbrigade (I) 69. Won by breaca (G) vs Eric1982 (I) 68. Won by Eric1982 (G) vs cspieker (I) 67. Won by cspieker (G) vs Maximus c23 (I) 66. Won by cspieker (I) vs badivan1 (G) 65. Won by cspieker (G) vs Gocki (I) 64. Won by cspieker (I) vs ZergSlayer (G)...

70. Who is next? 69. Won by breaca (G) vs Eric1982 (I) 68. Won by Eric1982 (G) vs cspieker (I) 67. Won by cspieker (G) vs Maximus c23 (I) 66. Won by cspieker (I) vs badivan1 (G) 65. Won by cspieker (G) vs Gocki (I) 64. Won by cspieker (I) vs ZergSlayer (G) 63. Won by cspieker (G) vs SHOWMAN99 (I) 62...

https://tinyurl.com/GhostRatings Apologies to all for the very long delay. Some notes: 1v1 ratings now have single component ratings for each variant and a total overall rating formed by averaging the two ratings, weighted by number of games played of each. This was discussed a few months ago, but ...

FvA Set 144 breaca (2) v AviF (0)
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=227814
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=227815

I too eagerly await the monthly GR update (seems so much more relevant than the sites point system).

Very grateful to ghug whenever he has the time to do this.

All this talk about how hard it is to join games with a low reliability rating or to restore reliability rating once it is lowered, but what about the perspective of the victims of a civil disorder? Let me advocate for them. The experience of multiple players (everyone else in the match) is damaged...

GvI Set 119 breaca v swordsman3003
I picked up 2-0.
https://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=226511
https://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=226512

GvIS set 109 breaca wins 2:0 against dagabs0
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=225692
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=225693

Maniac wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 29, 2018 8:35 pm

CptMike wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 29, 2018 7:54 pm

Anyway, interferometry is very precise and efficient. We don't need to reach the 70 km/s. We can go much slowier and just measure the little shift.

Thx for introducing me to interferometry

I thought that might be inferiometry!

goldfinger0303 wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:20 pm

Hello all. I've joined the team to get this going. Just give me a while to catch up and update everything.

Thank you. It does seem to be needing some attention.

Let’s assume it was me, for that game. It’s not BTW. You would just have broke the anonymity rules just create by this site, correct? And you’re a mod? I don't think you are breaking anonymity by posting a link to a game with no reference to who is playing which country. Otherwise it would be again...

GR-03: cspieker - DEFENDING CHAMPION GR-01: CptMike GR-02: xorxes GR-04: MadMarx GR-06: RoganJosh GR-10: mhsmith0 GR-13: dipperjay GR-14: genghiz GR-15: brkyzgn GR-18: Ezio GR-20: badivan1 GR-22: michaelf77 GR-27: raiku770 GR-28: swordsman3003 GR-30: SpaceDip GR-31: Foxcastle GR-32: josemurc GR-44: ...

GR-03 : cspieker - DEFENDING CHAMPION
GR-01 : CptMike
GR-02 : xorxes
GR-04 : MadMarx
GR-06 : RoganJosh
GR-10 : mhsmith0
GR-14 : genghiz
GR-18 : Ezio
GR-19: breaca
GR-20 : badivan1
GR-35 : SpaceDip
GR-44 : rdrivera 2005
GR-49 : goldfinger0303

1. snowy801 2. ghug 3. xorxes 4. dargorygel 5. rdrivera 2005 6. peterlund 7. jamiet99uk 8. Reedeer1 9. Stressedlines 10. teacher2 11. thamrick 12. bozo 13. yavuzovic 14. 15. Telamor 16. 17. DemonRHK 18. 19. Ezio 20. 21. Subs: 1. Foxcastle 2. bo 3. Dropping out. I can now see (thanks to Tom's suggest...

peterlund wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:29 pm

So you only retract the use of the word "little" and not the other words you used to refer to me? Octavious, because of this I must ask you: Do *you* ever get laid?

Octavious, the subtleties of an English sense of humor may be lost here.

The phenomenon of incels makes me think about the emergence of monogamy as a cultural norm. In early social groups (pre-monogamy), there would have been a lot of incels (possibly the majority?). They would have been a powerful (and discontented) group. I imagine that monogamy arose as a result of a ...