If you are seeing an error on games please clear your browsers cache.

Finished: 09 PM Fri 07 Dec 18 UTC
American Election 1
1 days /phase (normal)
Pot: 100 D - Autumn, 2008, Finished
Fall of the American Empire IV, Rulebook press, Draw-Size Scoring
Game drawn
04 Dec 18 UTC Autumn, 2007: In all seriousness, I’ve played many a game with people who self righteously claim this philosophy. Fair enough I guess, but you’ll have to pardon me while I roll my eyes and move on to the next game.
05 Dec 18 UTC Autumn, 2007: As much as I hate it I agree with Mexico and California. It’s much more fun to make an alliance an stick to it till the end
05 Dec 18 UTC Autumn, 2007: Sorry you were outgunned, Quebec.
05 Dec 18 UTC Autumn, 2007: i guess we are playing different games. the point of the game is to win....drawing is second. drawing is definitely easier though, and you don't have to deal with icky feelings, so i understand that.

still, either mexico or cali could choose to take the win. it is on the table for either. or the lazy route. up to you i guess. a pity i have had to deal with a brain dead NY as a neighbor.
06 Dec 18 UTC Spring, 2008: GameMaster: Jxck was banned: Severe cheating. The time until the next phase has been extended by one phase length to give an opportunity to replace the player.
Remember to finalize your orders if you don't want to wait, so the game isn't held up unnecessarily!
06 Dec 18 UTC Spring, 2008: Moderator: (Claesar): Game paused to facilitate replacement.
06 Dec 18 UTC Spring, 2008: Moderator: (Claesar): Have fun all!
06 Dec 18 UTC A modest proposal. Since the amazingly efficient two way alliance that has dominated the game has been exposed to be full of 50% “severe cheaters”, I suggest a draw or cancel is in order.
06 Dec 18 UTC Sorry that this happened. One thing I hate more than losing is cheating. California has nothing to do with it I’m sure. He’s a good player.
06 Dec 18 UTC I agree we should all vote to cancel. The game has been ruined by the 'Severe Cheater" tag. It sucks for California that his ally was branded as such but still a cancel order is needed
07 Dec 18 UTC Yep. You’ll see I voted to draw and or cancel. It’s a shame.

I must admit I’m curious as to what “severe cheating” means. Never seen that adjective used. But I’m fairness, I concede.
07 Dec 18 UTC Moderator: (Claesar): The banned player was cheating in another game, but playing fairly here. This game was unspoiled, hence I allowed it to continue with a replacement.
07 Dec 18 UTC Moderator: (Claesar): I'm glad you all drew instead of cancelling. You all deserved to win here for a game well played.
07 Dec 18 UTC Yeah i may have gotten backstabbed by 4 people and completely murderd but it was very fun watching
07 Dec 18 UTC gg
07 Dec 18 UTC i did enjoy stabbing/being stabbed as per usual.
07 Dec 18 UTC If only New York has cooperated more we could have made a stand
07 Dec 18 UTC indeed. pretty sure he was just mad at me too much for cooperation. understandable.
07 Dec 18 UTC I played it exactly how I wanted to. But you’re right, wouldn’t have happened with NY’s help
07 Dec 18 UTC Without**

Start Backward Open large map Forward End

Frank9 (450 D)
Drawn. Bet: 0 D, won: 17 D
20 supply-centers, 20 units
DaButterMan (323 D)
Drawn. Bet: 10 D, won: 17 D
20 supply-centers, 19 units
SmuRumS (380 D)
Drawn. Bet: 10 D, won: 17 D
6 supply-centers, 6 units
Locke- (1401 D)
Drawn. Bet: 10 D, won: 17 D
5 supply-centers, 5 units
ishirkmywork (1349 D)
Drawn. Bet: 10 D, won: 17 D
4 supply-centers, 4 units
Varme (48 D)
Drawn. Bet: 10 D, won: 17 D
3 supply-centers, 3 units
cardboardbox (457 D)
Defeated. Bet: 0 D
legaala (234 D)
Defeated. Bet: 10 D
Lord_J (95 D)
Defeated. Bet: 10 D
BiggleBobb (45 D)
Defeated. Bet: 10 D
Archive: Orders - Maps - Messages